Ghana’s parliament passes strict new anti-LGBTQ legislation to extend sentences and expand scope

[ad_1]

Johannesburg — Ghana’s parliament approved a highly controversial anti-LGBTQ bill on Wednesday after months of debate. The Human Sexual Rights and Family Values bill is one of the toughest pieces of anti-LGBTQ legislation in Africa.

Homosexuality is already illegal in Ghana and punishable by up to three years in prison. Under the new law, that maximum sentence will increase to five years. It would also bring in a custodial sentence for people convicted of advocating for LGBTQ rights and make the distribution of material deemed supportive of LGBTQ rights illegal.

African Churches LGBTQ Rights
People attend a rally against a controversial bill being considered by Ghana’s parliament that would make identifying as LGBTQ or advocating for LGBTQ rights a criminal offense punishable by prison, in the Harlem neighborhood of New York, Oct. 11, 2021.

Emily Leshner/AP


The bill, which was sponsored by a group of traditional leaders from Ghana’s Christian and Muslim communities, now must be signed into law by President Nana Akufo-Addo. He’s widely expected to do so, though he’s not said publicly whether he’ll sign the legislation.

The Big 18 & Human Rights Coalition, an umbrella group of lawyers and activists in Ghana, said at a Tuesday news conference that the bill “criminalizes a person’s identity and strips away fundamental human rights” and urged the president to reject it.

Takyiwaa Manuh, a senior fellow at the Ghana Centre for Democratic Development, noted to CBS News that Akufo-Addo has not signed any previous privately sponsored bills into law due to the demands of an article in the country’s constitution that requires scrutiny over potential financial impacts of legislation. 

Manuh said the speaker of the parliament had carried out no such analysis of the new bill as required, and that if it is enacted, she argued that it would place a “heavy burden on the judiciary, the police and other aspects of life.”

“I am sad, disappointed and surprised that our commitment and democratic principles in this country appear to be so shallow,” lamented Manuh. “This bill represents a real danger to our country, and we are looking to the president to uphold the values of our country and constitution.”


ACLU tracking bills targeting LGBTQ+ community in Oklahoma

05:47

Manuh said Ghanaian civil society organizations were ready to file legal challenges against the bill.  

“Shockingly, we have found that the majority of people haven’t even read the bill,” which she said, “implies duties on parents, landlords, owners of businesses.”

She said when people do read and understand how they could actually be implicated by the legislation, they’re shocked at how it could make them liable for the actions of others.

As the debate over the bill increased in recent weeks, so did attacks on members of the LGBTQ community. Activists say students have been attacked and expelled from school, people have been robbed, and many have been subjected to extortion from community members threatening to out them.

Manuh said her organizatioon had received numerous reports of people being banished from their hometowns, losing their jobs and all support from their own families.

“It’s a chilling feeling,” she told CBS News. “No one should face jail time or harassment for their sexuality. Their rights must be respected.”

The United Nations warned in 2021 that the proposed law would “create a system of state-sponsored discrimination and violence” against gay people in Ghana.

The top constitutional court in Uganda, the nation with the most extreme anti-LGBTQ laws in Africa, is currently considering a ruling on a law there that threatens life imprisonment and even death for homosexuality. 

Ugandan civil rights groups immediately challenged the anti-homosexuality act when it passed in December. The U.S. has condemned that legislation and sanctioned Uganda by restricting visas and withholding trade over it.

It is not clear how long the court may take to issue its ruling on the constitutionality of the law.

[ad_2]

Source link